AUP VS THE IEC

A NEW WORD FOR SYRIA...

The Syrian Parabole- (The 3D Chess Game with 50 Shades of Grey)

With the latest international incident one has to question ...what will happen next? - Russia has just sent a warship into the area to support its forces...but the BIG BIG question is… WHAT WILL TURKEY DO? -

Historically they have always resented big super powers coming into their orbit of influence… we saw that in Cyprus when America did what Russia is doing right now…

And what about NATO? -

What – if anything...will they do?

But the Syrian problem is not just black and white… its many shades of Grey – You've got Kurds… you've got the IS… you've got Assad… its one snake biting the other in a pit of snakes…

you've got oil barons buying oil from Islamic State- and they are Turkish as well as others in the area… people doing business ...making big money for IS- which is in turn used to buy weapons…

then you have IS fighting the Kurds...and the Turks fighting the Kurds…and Assad fighting the rebels and the “ moderates “ - as well as the IS...then Russia is supporting Assad-

its like a modern day Serbia …

The Syrian Parabole is not a chessmove like a gambit or en passant… it is a vortex. It is 50 shades of grey..with some people talking about totalitarianism- others about authoritarianism...and still others wondering what kind of coalition is going to be built to stop both Assad and the Islamic State.

And to unravel it one has to put it in the right context. And the only one you can put it into is World War One… there's no sudden assassination here – but the comparison is in HOW the main nations of Europe AND elsewhere got sucked into this maelstrom…

And yet...to play this particular game one should learn 3D or 4D chess. Its a real game… and it was used to analyse attacks from all angles…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-dimensional_chess

The point is that IF we are to WIN this war against IS… we have to win over THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF THE SYRIAN PEOPLE!

It is they who are suffering the most… in fact ..if this event had been taking place in Europe – as it happened in Serbia… NATO would get involved and indeed drive the agenda.

As it happens – no one is looking for a bloody red nose yet…

But in truth … that might not be necessary…

ENTER TURKEY.

A country that is opposed to Assad. If they were to invade Syria it would put them right to the top of the hit parade amongst Muslim NATIONS… AND ...AND… WITH THIS CURRENT ESCALATION … it just might.

Its is now up to the Turkish govt of ERDOGAN, to do what he feels is the right thing to do… - and what is that? - with the downing of the Russian airplane – and the warship coming to interatnional waters just off the coast of Turkey,…

GET READY FIR TURKEY TO INVADE SYRIA… GET READY FOR NATO TO SUPPORT TURKEY… AND THE UN… GET READY… for… WORLD WAR III…

Cause if Turkey does decide to annihilate Assad… WE ARE ALL IN TROUBLE… BUT the truth is … we all know that Turkey is the only one who can get rid of this evil regime of Bashir Assad. And whther Nato or Russia likes it or not… they are the only ones who can confront IS face to face … have no fear for anything as long as the Turkish government are on the ground.. they will DESTROY IS …

and this is the parabole… the comparison… IT IS A HIGH LEVEL MULTI DIMENSIONAL GAME WHICH IF THE WRONG MOVES ARE MADE COULD LEAD TO ARMAGEDDON.

It is unfortunate… but it can only be Turkey AS A MUSLIM COUNTRY...that can and should demand to confront ISIS on the ground…

HOW TO DEFEAT THE ISLAMIC STATE

SYRIA: TO BOMB OR NOT TO BOMB...THAT IS THE QUESTION

In this last weeks frenzy of solidarity with the atrocity in Paris committed by IS ( Islamic State)-

the defense review spending has increased by another 15 billion pounds or more… this is the middle of an economic slowdown and austerity measures ...most of which are affecting the poorest and most vulnerable in the UK.

So what is the argument to go out and throw a few bombs on some goats and derelict houses … ?

Is it a symbolic bombing ?

Will it destroy IS?

Will it give them a hiding?

Will it show them that you shouldn’t mess with the West?

Will it make them think twice next time they decide to attack us?

Will it achieve a show of unity against terrorism?

Will it make the world a safer place?

I dont think so. All it will do is further strengthen the position of President Assads criminal regime that gasses people.

And … this is the big and… it will lead to further resentment amongst the European Muslim Community amongst us…

Will it degrade the IS?

Yes – initially… and it might help a combination of Assad , the rebels and the Kurds on the ground to root out IS…

But will it defeat them?

Probably not.

No… the biggest danger is this…

It will lead to further migration of Syrians to Europe.

It will cost the West billions.

It will in fact polarise Muslims who are moderate to be more sympathetic to the cause of Jihad..and in fact further radicalise them here.

But that is a risk that David Cameron is willing to take.

President Putin has brought more respect amongst the Gulf states today with his vision of energy security and the future … but will those Muslims who see it as the West punishing them incline their ears to the extremist rhetoric ?

Firstly, we cannot underestimate the scope of this problem…

it is a global one. It isnt isolated to Syria alone. In Nigeria Boko Haram have continued to massacre civilians – as have Shabbab terrorists in Somalia… the problem extends to the Phillipines- Indonesia … Afghanistan.. even China...it is like the modern day spread of Communism.

The more we aggressively bomb from above ...the more we will be seen as cowards by Muslims all over the world… and in fact those Muslims that are in the GREY zone… WILL turn.

And theres another issue… the spread of the far right in Europe and elsewhere…this is something we cannot underestimate either.

The majority of Muslims wish to live peacefully amongst us as our fellow citizens.

But after Paris the most astonishing thing is that of the conspicuous lack of condemnation from the Muslim Communities. I have heard their arguments … and they use MORAL RELATIVISM to judge the West for its AGGRESSION against Muslims and in fact .. they justify the attacks as a result of the West bombing hospitals – children- innocent civilians.. its rather like the same feeling we had when IS were slaughtering and raping Yasidi Christians.

In fact by bombing Syria it will only exasporate the problem even further…

No. The way through this quagmire is to decapitate the head of IS… which isnt a figure head but an idea.

What is this idea?

It is this. Jihad bil Kuffar...war against the infidels. For Muslims they see it as a war against their faith. IT WILL IN FACT ONLY LEAD TO FURTHER POLARISATION AND RADICALISATION OF MUSLIMS IN EUROPE.

People who were moderate will in fact ...over time...once the pictures come in… start think about becoming a jihadist.

Despite how it looks … bombing Syria WILL NOT WORK.

It is a short term political fix. IF ITS GOING TO BE WAR...THEN IT WILL HAVE TO BE ALL OUT WAR.

But in the long term we need to engage Muslims in our communities and ask them if they really want to live amongst us or not… we need to take them out of the Middle Ages and integrate them into our national life… if they truly believe in Jihad bil Kuffar on the Quran … THEN THEY MUST LEAVE OUR SHORES and go back to where they came from.

Its this ideology that is the problem. It doesnt matter what they wear … or what they eat… or how they pray… thats irrelevant… what is relevant however is what they believe in...if it leads to violence in our communities…

and the final point… educate everyone on counter terorism...do it in the schools..the offices...everywhere… be prepared..because if this country votes to bomb Syria… there will be more terrorist attack on European soil.

The biggest problem is the political will of this government to engage this key tenet...pillar of Islam.. Jiahdism. A Muslim doesnt get radicalised instantly… its over time. Everyone can watch images on youtube of what goes on now… you cant censor information anymore..they will make up their own minds individually… there needs to be an INTERFAITH SUMMIT ON ISLAMIC RADICALISATION… Invite business leaders- religious leaders- members of the public… involve the citizens of this country on what should be done to combat this problem.

Mostly in the judiciary… if a Muslim is found to be a member of this ideology of Jihadism… he or she should be stripped of their citizenships and sent packing… certainly if the political leaders of Europe do nothing to stop it… the far right will.

They are already doing it in countries like Poland. Imagine if a Muslim were to wlak on the streets of Krakow or Warsaw with a TSHIRT saying… “ I BELIEVE IN JIHAD!”…

I dont think he would get a warm welcome..the truth is… 50 % of Muslims do believe in it… if not overtly ..secretly.

Its there we need to bomb… in the hearts of those radical Muslims.

Bombing Syria for more than 2 weeks or so wont do much. It will in fact stir up the hornets nest even more.

Are we ready for that blowback?..I dont think so. No amount of rhetoric will stop another attack from happening… Cameron must win the trust of the Muslim Community ..as well as making it clear… “ If you believe in a war against the infidels as part of your religion and your Holy Quran...you are not welcome to live amongst us… you must leave this country and never return!”

Now is the time to be straight and direct...and mean it.

THE MEANING OF JIHAD.

WHAT IS JIHAD?- is it a pillar of Islam that allows Muslims to commit Indiscriminate violence?

jihad

dʒɪˈhɑːd/

noun

noun: jihad; plural noun: jihads; noun: jehad; plural noun: jehads

1. (among Muslims) a war or struggle against unbelievers.
   "he declared a jihad against the infidels"
   • Islam
     the spiritual struggle within oneself against sin.
     noun: greater jihad; noun: greater jehad; plural noun: greater jihads
     
     
     
     

There is a difference between GREATER AND LESSER JIHAD- GREATER- is the struggle within yourself and LESSER -is the struggle against the outside world – against unbelievers etc.

However,it is regarded by a minority of shia muslims as a pillar of islam but is nevertheless central to the Islamic religion and way of life.

The Messenger of Allah was asked about the best jihad. He said: "The best jihad is the one in which your horse is slain and your blood is spilled" (also cited by Ibn Nuhaas and narrated by Ibn Habbaan).[30]- ie the BEST is the “LESSER” JIHAD- ( violent physical struggle against the infidel)

What the Prophet Mohammed was saying here is simple. When you are on your horse in war and if you fight ...you must fight so hard that you cannot ride on your horse anymore...you should be in the middle of it..the thick of the fighting. The horses that were usually slain in battle were the ones that were the first to engage the enemy and were in the middle of the fighting. 
 

He carries on to say… “ and your own blood is spilled…!!!”- meaning that not only have you gone right to the middle of the fight … you were on the frontline… engaging the battle at its most fiercest so that you either got wounded or even killed because of your passion…

He didn't want soldiers that were hanging back ..waiting for others to take the most risks… and finally… it is very clear… the jihadis were to FIGHT… PHYSICALLY….to win the GREATEST REWARD!

According to "Orientalist" (historian of the Middle East) Bernard Lewis, "the overwhelming majority of classical theologians, jurists", and specialists in the hadith "understood the obligation of jihad in a military sense."[15] Javed Ahmad Ghamidi states that there is consensus among Islamic scholars that the concept of jihad will always include armed struggle against wrong doers.[16]

So the scholars – the people who study the Quran say it INCLUDES a “MILITARY” – a violent PHYSICAL struggle against perceived evil doers! Ie Those in European or Western orientated or in fact any other doer… who is regarded as evil.

A struggle that includes the use of force… violence..

The primary aim of jihad as warfare is not the conversion of non-Muslims to Islam by force, but rather the expansion and defense of the Islamic state.[41][42] In theory, jihad was to continue until "all mankind either embraced Islam or submitted to the authority of the Muslim state." There could be truces before this was achieved, but no permanent peace.[35] One who died 'on the path of God' was a martyr, (Shahid), whose sins were remitted and who was secured "immediate entry to paradise."[43] (However, some argue martyrdom is never automatic because it is within God's exclusive province to judge who is worthy of that designation.[44])

With the Islamic revival, a new "Fundamentalist" movement arose, with some different interpretations of Islam, often with an increased emphasis on jihad. The Wahhabi movement which spread across the Arabian peninsula starting in the 18th century, emphasized jihad as armed struggle.[63] Wars against Western colonial forces were often declared jihad: the Sanusi religious order proclaimed it against Italians in Libya in 1912, and the "Mahdi" in the Sudan declared jihad against the British and the Egyptians in 1881.[43]

Jihad (English pronunciation: /dʒɪˈhɑːd/; Arabic: جهاد‎ jihād [dʒiˈhæːd]) is an Islamic term referring to the religious duty of Muslims to maintain the religion. In Arabic, the word jihād is a noun meaning "to strive, to apply oneself, to struggle, to persevere".[1] A person engaged in jihad is called a mujahid, the plural of which is mujahideen (مجاهدين). The word jihad appears frequently in the Quran,[2] often in the idiomatic expression "striving in the way of God (al-jihad fi sabil Allah)", to refer to the act of striving to serve the purposes of God on this earth.[1][3][4][5]



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad

WHAT JIHAD IS

• The Arabic word "jihad" is often translated as "holy war," but in a purely linguistic sense, the word " jihad" means struggling or striving.
• The arabic word for war is: "al-harb".
• In a religious sense, as described by the Quran and teachings of the Prophet Muhammad (s), "jihad" has many meanings. It can refer to internal as well as external efforts to be a good Muslims or believer, as well as working to inform people about the faith of Islam.
• If military jihad is required to protect the faith against others, it can be performed using anything from legal, diplomatic and economic to political means. If there is no peaceful alternative, Islam also allows the use of force, but there are strict rules of engagement. Innocents - such as women, children, or invalids - must never be harmed, and any peaceful overtures from the enemy must be accepted.
• Military action is therefore only one means of jihad, and is very rare. To highlight this point, the Prophet Mohammed told his followers returning from a military campaign: "This day we have returned from the minor jihad to the major jihad," which he said meant returning from armed battle to the peaceful battle for self-control and betterment.
• In case military action appears necessary, not everyone can declare jihad. The religious military campaign has to be declared by a proper authority, advised by scholars, who say the religion and people are under threat and violence is imperative to defend them. The concept of "just war" is very important.
• The concept of jihad has been hijacked by many political and religious groups over the ages in a bid to justify various forms of violence. In most cases, Islamic splinter groups invoked jihad to fight against the established Islamic order. Scholars say this misuse of jihad contradicts Islam.
• Examples of sanctioned military jihad include the Muslims' defensive battles against the Crusaders in medieval times, and before that some responses by Muslims against Byzantine and Persian attacks during the period of the early Islamic conquests.
  

http://islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/legal-rulings/5-jihad-a-misunderstood-concept-from-islam.html?start=9



Comment: This is a good definition but attempts to act as an apologist for acts of jihad throughout the world in defense of perceived acts of war by the West … It emphasises the context in modern times and ignores the overall perception by muslims and non muslims alike. In fact it promotes jihad as something good. It is isnt. Islamic State rape, burn alive women and children.. torture , behead and use the most brutal methods of indiscriminate killing they can imagine… why? Because they dont have the budget to conduct a conventional war against the infidel...but instead wear him down by a prolonged and protracted guerilla war. This we have seen in Europe where migrants are forced onto boats heaidng to Europe… where even jihadists use human compassion to infiltrate and hit targets in Europe such as was seen in France. It is true that Muslims have something against the West for their acts of terror in their own lands… by bombing innocent civilians etc… but the issue is of people who LIVE in Europe as European citizens with all the rights of others… where their freedom of practising their religion is enshrined in the human rights act.



The question still remains… what does jihad or holy war mean to Muslims living in Europe?
Does it mean that it is something that is a holy duty according to the teachings of Islam ...and its prophet… or not?In the absence of other evidence… I conclude that it does.
Who inspired Osama Bin Laden to wage war on the West with his own brand of Jihad?- A BRAND THAT HAS BEEN UPDATED BY ISIS- or IS- Islamic State...
Sayyid Qutb, the radical Egyptian ideologue whose theological/political dogma energizes Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda, wrote extensively about implementing a totalitarian rule of Islam, nation after nation. Qutb’s rationale was straightforward: neither the contemporary Muslim world nor Western philosophical, political, or religious traditions could heal what he perceived as history’s fatal flaw: the deep divide between secular and sacred created by societies and nations.
The vanguard was to be propelled by another of Qutb’s radical doctrines, his view of jihad, which gives today’s new jihadi groups their unrelenting, violent centrifugal force. Conventional wisdom today posits two, perhaps three, types of jihad. One would be a military jihad.



http://www.equip.org/article/submit-or-die-the-geostrategic-jihad-of-osama-bin-laden-and-al-qaeda-part-two/



Why are Muslims in denial ? - about the true meaning of modern day jihad…

Why is this the case? Why can’t so many liberals understand the pure evil of Islamic jihad? I can think of three reasons: First, they’re often in the grip of a strange kind of moral relativism. I say “strange” because it’s not true moral relativism. Actions of domestic political opponents are condemned in the strongest possible terms, and the history of Christianity is treated as if it is nothing less than one long story of war, rape, and conquest. That’s not relativism; that’s judgmental in the extreme. The relativism emerges when evaluating other cultures, where even dark deeds are excused by “culture” or “colonialism” and regions in the grips of the worst kinds of pathologies are hailed for their rich and glorious traditions.

Second, relativism drives the quest for justifications. Since there is no way that Western culture can be superior to Middle Eastern cultures, when the Middle East boils, there has to be a reason located outside the jihadists’ own beliefs and pathologies. The roots of jihad are never in Islam or in the pure nihilism of the jihadist, but rather in the oppression or injustice he’s suffered. The formula thus becomes painfully simple: End the oppression, and you’ll end jihad. Yes, they’re angry — says the liberal — but they’re angry for many very good reasons. #

Third, the quest for justification drives deception and willful ignorance.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/384877/why-do-liberals-have-trouble-understanding-pure-evil-jihad-david-french

Comment: And this is the main problem here… you wont find the majority of the Muslim world coming out and searing on the Quran that the Lesser Jihad – that of what is known as a “ Just War”… IS WRONG. !!!

The other problem not mentioned in this article is popular disambiguation – if for example in 1920 the word “ gay” meant “ happy”… IT DOESN'T TODAY…

Its the same because AMERICAN pop culture sees it as a totalitarian danger the same as COMMUNISM… a threat that wishes to destroy its own culture ( and ..they arnt wrong)

The average Muslim woman in Europe gives birth to 3.5 children. The average European 1.4. In fact in some countries … theres a negative growth rate. Europe needs fresh blood to work in the factories – do the menial jobs… pay taxes to keep the state going… ever consuming…

In the struggle for violent and non violent jihad… one thing is common - the overthrow of the unbelieving world by all and every means both politically, economically, ideologically and ...militarily. Individual holy jihad is for assisting the believer to accomplish this global vision of world domination.

WHAT DO MUSLIM CLERICS SAY THEMSELVES ABOUT JIHAD?

There is enough research material if you look closely to see that in fact ...there isnt a grey zone...not for the majority of muslims who are living in the West. Jihad is part of the faith of Islam. Its not a non violent doctrine… NO… in the video below clerics themselves state clearly that Jihad is about striking at unbelievers to bring them to Islam. It even states in the QURAN ( sura 56) to strike TERROR in the hearts of the disbeliever...” THERE IS NO GREY ZONE.

Respected disciple of Mohammed DEEDAT – Sheikh Zakir Naik – clearly explains that building any places of worship in Islamic countries is forbidden.

This shocking video should be aired on every TV station in Europe and in all the West if you think this is all a joke… an illusion. No- JIHAD IS A PILLAR OF ISLAM. And its NOT a spiritual struggle within oneself… it is collectively understood as a MILITANT struggle by all and any means overt- deceptive- economic- political- intellectual...and physical.

This is unfortunately what we are facing here. If the political leaders in the West do nothing about it… this cancer will grow in our society ...and it will lead to further polarisation as time goes by… and eventually… every day normal people sick and tired of putting up with violence on their streets will take the law into their own hands…

If the government fails the people… fails to see the threat of psychologically allowing lesser jihad to take over our civilisation , our values… and indeed ...even greater jihad for that matter – when it comes to winning the hearts and the minds of the disenfranchised 99% …

we will see bloody civil war on our streets..riots…uprisings…this is NOT about racism...its NOT about religionist exclusion… NOT about Islamophobia… we cannot apologise for a doctrine that promotes terrorism. Its like watching someone beat their dog each week or month… and saying..well ...its not all people that do that – and then you ask the person why he or she is doing that… and they say.. “ its my faith… I have to do it every Sunday!”…

But I also am working on myself to eradicate my own demons…

So you let him or her continue doing what they are doing. If we allow Muslims who live...who work...who make money..who invest… who build mosques … their own faith schools… who procreate 3 times more than the average Europeans ...who use our social welfare system.. who benefit form our universities… to live out this warped ideology of supremacy… then we are the fools.

If you come in peace… welcome. If you wish to follow the law of the land...welcome… but if you want to hold onto your belief of domination ...or if you wish to impose your order onto our civilisation and its values… if you believe by doing so… you are performing a holy duty…

if you honestly believe in jihad as a vehicle to impose your views and will onto Europe and the world… then… you must pack up and leave… !

Its that simple.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4LmGPg8ScQ

Final Note: I know and love many Muslims around the world. They are great people. My friends. I also know many Jews… many Buddhists...Hindus...Christians and atheists… yet because I have come out against the doctrine of JIHAD… I have been labelled as a “ white supremacist sexist racist extremist Zionist Crusader bigot...” ( I think Ive included most of the criticisms..the rest is unprintable- the slurs and name calling – even the defamation and lies … I really don’t care about- why? Because ...

NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH.

I am against the use of indiscriminate violence and corrupt methods of control and manipulation to further the goals and ambitions of those who would take the free world into their medieval mindset.
Make no mistake… this issue is not about Islamophobia..Ive seen so much beauty in this faith… so much brotherhood..love...and community.., Muslims do really care about social justice ..giving to the poor… hospitality… sometimes much more than Christians.
But to condone terrorism by saying nothing and doing nothing about the Paris attacks ( paying lip service – and trying to say… well look at what the West has done to Muslims…) - you live here… amongst us… the foreign policy of the European nations may not be the best… but you can lobby to change that… as I did way back in 1991 when I was the only one to publicly do so and was voted by the Sun newspaper as twit of the week for trying to stop the invasion of Iraq …
Long before the STOPTHE WAR coalition started doing anything… I came out against invading IRAQ.
Neither can this extremist element label me as a Christian extremist – why? Because I'm a Rainbow Focaliser having organised over 10 interfaith gatherings around the world in the last 25 years.
Nor can I be labelled a racist – as the political founder of the Africa Unite party I CAMPAIGNED TIRELESSLY AGAINST RACIALLY MOTIVATED VIOLENCE… ( And I don't want to talk about my activism as an anti apartheid student on campus in Johannesburg in 1981.
( see www.africauniteparty.org)
Finally, I myself knows what injustice feels like. I was wrongly imprisoned by this country for 3 and a half years… but instead of taking up the sword.. I went to the appeal courts and won my case… proving my innocence!!!



The truth is I feel that the rise of Islam in the West is NOT in the spirit of what people want… to spread your religion through fear… NO…
It is only the religion of LOVE that will dominate this Earth one day. And God is LOVE!
But I'm not going to kill you to prove it… my inner war is with myself… my own demons… and my outer war is with those who would use injustice,terror and deception to blind the world of this fact.
Jihad is the 6^th pillar of Islam… no doubt. It includes ( the lesser vehicle) – armed struggle against the unbeliever… even the moderate Muslims who are regarded as the Jahili- the backslidden Muslims… As a course of action… Muslims need to themselves stand up to this evil ideal. An ideal that will take us all back to the dark ages… if they agree its not important… well ...history will prove them very wrong when next they fall victim to these ignorant – lost people.
……………………………………………...

MH17-ONE YEAR ON...WHO SHOULD TAKE RESPONSIBILITY?

WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DOWNING OF MH17?

I'm just an observer like anyone else – but fortunately I possess an open mind. I've looked at several reports by various media outlets like RT, CNN, Al Jazeera – BBC as well as more alternative news stations...and I've combined that with my own knowledge of the politics of the region. I visited Ukraine in 2008 – Eastern Ukraine and spent some time in a city called Mariupol on the coast. This region is famous for its caviar and its steel refinery...and its football team… ( and of course its beautiful women)!- but the conversations I was having then already spoke about the divide and possibility of a civil war ...and a split. I did in fact publish a blog saying exactly that… of course it was smothered by the mainstream media- once again.

Lets have a look at the facts.

1. MH17 flew across Eastern Ukraine which was already a designated war zone.

2. Fragments of a Russian BUK missile were supposedly found at the site.

3. Witnesses apparently saw a jet attacking the airplane coming form Ukrainian airspace.

4. Evidence was tampered with before official investigators appeared at the site.

5. Video dialogue was recorded by separatists saying “ who let this plane fly through this corridor?”

Question:

1. Who shot the plane down and how?

It was most likely in my opinion shot down by surface to air missile supplied by Russia. The witnesses that were interviewed can not be relied since they may have been bribed or threatened to make such statements.

However, it cant be ruled out that a Ukrainian jet shot the plane down. But why? - any pilot would be trained to spot the difference between a civilian aircraft and a military aircraft. He would have to be a complete idiot to not know. Also he would have to receive the orders from the highest authority. And the President would definitively be in the know about such a counter intelligence plot. The only motivation for this would of course be to make Russia look bad and for America to escalate NATO occupation of the Western front. This of course would make sense if it were so.

But there is no direct evidence of this conspiracy. Not yet. In the absence of that one has to go on the words of the Donesk commander as it happened. They had the tools to shoot down jets entering their airspace – who by the way were used to bomb civilian targets- so they were fully justified in defending themselves by perceived threats. They probably mistook it for a fighter jet – aimed the weapon ...and got lucky ...then realised it was a passenger jet. This is most likely what happened. The weapon used could theoretically reach the high altitude aircraft- which most likely wasn’t that high as normal.

So if the Ukrainian airforce didn't shoot it down… who did? The Donesk defense force.

2. Who is responsible for the downing of MH17?

The plane was flying from West to East ( at least that is what the reports say)… therefore it was flying across Ukrainian airspace. It was flying at a low enough altitude to be shot down by surface to air BUK missiles. It flew across Ukraine into the Eastern Ukrainian airspace – where a genuine war was going on. It was tracked – without doubt by Ukrainian air traffic controllers. They would have been aware that it was a passenger plane flying across air space that was in a conflict zone. They would have also been aware that according to any international treaty on these matters- which the Ukrainian government would have signed- that safety comes first.

It is standard procedure NOT to route planes through conflict corridors. But they did. WHY? -

This was an accident waiting to happen and it in fact benefited the Ukranians in their efforts to gain international support against the separatists and to put Russia in the spotlight for supplying munitions and food. MH17 was a pawn. A pawn sacrificed to achieve a greater goal of bringing NATO into Ukraine and defending its borders from Russian expansion and separatists- they have already lost the jewel in the crown – Crimea...and national pride is at an all time low. Ukrainian people are very proud of their country. But the truth is not all of them are. Some want to be with Russia. Its like a wife wanting to leave her lover and wanting to go back to her husband… Russia in this case ...is the husband.

But there is another element besides this. The Malaysian airlines. They themselves should have known WHERE their planes were flying… they should have made it CLEAR to the pilot of the plane… we ARNT flying over eastern Ukraine… its obvious. So they must also take a measure of responsibility for cutting corners in the name of human lives.

They also need to apologise to the victims…

So it may be that the separatists pulled the trigger… in defense of their loved ones- whom the Ukrainian air force were bombing( we saw it on TV every day)…

They may have pulled the trigger that shot the plane down… but it was most definitely the fault of the flight controllers in Kiev – who should have known better not to send civilian aircraft into conflict zones… and also the responsibility of Malaysian airlines for NOT thinking of the safety of their passengers first.

As ANY pilot knows … whenever you fly somewhere...you log a flight plan. This flight plan is KNOWN before the plane takes off. The corridor the flight plan was logged in was ok'ed by the Malaysian pilots themselves...and logged.

This tragic event should be a lesson both to airlines and to governments. You dont allow passenger planes to fly through conflict zones. Who is responsible for loading the gun ? - Who is repsonsible for this tragedy?

Its obvious. The airlines themselves. MALAYSIAN AIR.

But questions need to be asked also from the air traffic controllers in Kiev.

3. Was there a conspiracy – or was this an accident?

In my opinion – it was an act of negligence . We all love a good conspiracy story – but in this case ...I think its far more simple ... A chain of events that were brought about by irresponsible airlines and air traffic controllers. I don't believe this was a conspiracy. If the CIA were involved – it still points back to the airlines. They have autonomy. They can think. They can say yes or no. They chose capitalism instead. They chose to cut a few corners and save gas by flying through a WAR ZONE.

There's no need for a cover up. War is war. Shit happens in war. War is terrible. But by demonising Russia … all you are doing is shifting the blame for what really happened and dishonouring the victims and their families.

4. What now?

Malaysian Air needs to pay compensation to the families of the victims. The best thing you can give the families of the victims however..is the truth. If the separatists shot the plane down… admit it. If the Ukrainian government over rode the wishes of the air traffic controllers… expecting a disaster to happen so they could use it for propaganda purposes to get NATO INVOLVED… they too need to apologise for allowing the plane into a conflict corridor.

The BEST thing besides the TRUTH to the victims …. is to sue for peace!The Ukrainian government needs to bite the bullet and sit around the table to negotiate peace. THIS CIVIL WAR MUST END.

This would be the best thing for the victims of this disaster. Stop needless lives and needless blood being spilt. That would be the BEST tribute for the victims for the MH17 crash and the best way to honour their lives.

I thank you

PRD.

The Covenant of the Prophet Muhammad with the Monks of Mount Sinai with ...

HOW LABOUR CAN WIN !-an what it means if they do...

we at the AUP fully support International Development in Africa. We still have not seen anything from Britain in the form of an acknowledgement for its exploitation of Africas wealth,people,resources and...SLAVES.  British institutions like Barcalys, Natwest, Lloyds were built on the blood, sweat and tears of Africans. Tony Blair dessite all the lies he said about Iraq has acknowledged a veiled form of apology...

But if Africa is to see any of the restoration it needs it will need a government in power that understands its historic role and what responsibility it has to its future. A future of c operation and understanding of the issues.

A Socialist view but a pragmatic one. So ... what kind of government will win the next election in May , and which form do the AUP support?

This is simple.One that can say..sorry.

This is one small step that Labour can make in its revival and victory in these upcoming elections.

so what must he do?

LABOURS ED MILLIBAND MUST BITE THE BULLET TO WIN THE MAY 2015 ELECTION
If Ed Milliband or “ Red Ed” as he is known by the Tory conservative tabloid press is to head up the next UK government he must do a “Faustian deal” with his political enemies. The key to David Camerons thrust for power after elections is that he had better negotiation skills than Labour- who were intransigent... had they put the RIGHT deal on the table we would have seen a LABDEM coalition not a CONDEM marriage.

But what kind of winning coalition will put him on the throne in No 10? - simple... give the people...what they want... and what is it they really really want ED?
1. An end to austerity measures that have seen a removal of legal aid, staff cuts in prisons and hospitals.
2. A more compassionate way to give the unemployed a chance to stand on their own two feet rather than ruthlessly cutting or sanctioning benefits.
3.A guarantee the NHS will not be privatised.
4.FREE education for all.
5.An end to trident and foreign interventionist wars.
6. A greener Britain and a more fairer Britain that respect human rights...
7. Job creation, investment in small and new businesses.
8. A massive housing boom that will give first time buyers a chance own their own home.
9. A curb on immigration of cheap labour ...a distinction between social right s and human rights. ( as it is done in Norway)
10.Prosecution of bankers who caused the 2008 disaster and a reform of the judiciary.

I call this a “ A SOCIALIST ALLIANCE”... people don't trust Labour as it ruined the economy. Took away peoples rights and has made us suffer for their bankrupt economic policies. But in politics people have short memories and after a time they want to try the same thing that put them in a mess in the first place- like a dog going back to its own vomit... but the British voter isnt that stupid anymore...for the Tories or Labour to come into power they will have to seek a NEW coalition and the kingmakers in this one are not the GREENS or the SNP...not even the LIBERAL DEMOCRATS...or SINN FEIN or even the SWP.
NO.
The key to victory for either party is Mr. Nigel Farrage. UKIP. If there's a hung parliament – a split vote in this May's election... it will be decided on ONE issue...
OPT IN OR OPT OUT OF EUROPE.
And secondly... AUSTERITY MEASURES... who is responsible???? we all know... the banks. Its highly protected and monopolised in this country when the financial sector should be opened up. In Turkey HSBC offers 10.4 % on savings. In England it offers only 2 or 3 % - if you're lucky....why?
Simple. Its a money-spinner and keeps the country in gravy...
DEREGULATE THE BANKS and you will see economic revival in this country.



So in conclusion how should red ED play this?
a. A FAUSTIAN DEAL WITH THE DEVIL? - UKIP. - Which means the British people will decide themselves IN or OUT.
b. A SOCIALIST ALLIANCE with everyone else... which may or may not put him past the post...
Shall we see a LABDEM coalition or a LABKIP ( sic) coalition...meaning a GREEK SOLUTION … will the QUEEN of England accept this GREEK style democracy...or does it matter?
The answer is she will have to accept it GREEK STYLE because its our democracy and we have the right to choose how we wish to be governed...but the politicians of this country are going to have to learn they cant keep the elite in gravy forever.
The 99 percent shall govern...ED needs to show some BALLS and do what needs to be done... EAT THE PORK SANDWICH... BITE THE BULLET... BEND BACKWARDS … FOR THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY AN ITS PEOPLE … and not BEND OVER FOR THE FAT CAT ESTABLISHMENT.
If hes not got what it takes … hell be in the opposite seat for a long time to come whining and moaning... people are sick of austerity...sick of paying for the bankers mistakes...sick of being lied to about Iraq... AND OTHER STUPID WARS... and misuse of taxpayers money...
If Ed Milliband wants to impress the electorate he needs to become transparent...honest and straightforward. Maybe thats a tall order but thats what he needs to do to WIN this election and the confidence of the British electorate.